Skip to content
Home / Wood Compare / Hard Maple vs European Beech
Professional Comparison · Verified Engineering Data · Updated 19 July 2026

Hard Maple VS European Beech

Which wood is better for your project? Scores are computed from the verified figures on each species page — how we score.
Verdict: near-tie. The right choice depends on the application — see winner by category below.
🥇
Hard Maple
12/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood
  • Leads on lightness, machining ease — a narrow but consistent edge

Full Hard Maple data sheet →

🥈
European Beech
11/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood
  • Close second across most categories
  • Solid choice where its profile fits the project

Full European Beech data sheet →

Visual comparison

Hard MapleEuropean Beech
Hardness (Janka)percentile of 60-species library
Densitypercentile of 60-species library
Bending strength (MOR)percentile of 60-species library
Stiffness (MOE)percentile of 60-species library
Durabilitypercentile of 60-species library
Dimensional stabilitypercentile of 60-species library

Winner by category

There isn't one universally best wood — there's a best wood for each purpose.

CategoryWinner
DurabilityTie
StabilityTie
HardnessTie
Strength (MOR)Tie
Stiffness (MOE)European Beech
Flame spreadTie
Machining easeHard Maple
LightnessHard Maple

Engineering data

PropertyHard MapleEuropean Beech
Janka Hardness1450WD lbf1450WD lbf
Density0.63FPL g/cm³0.68WD g/cm³
MOE12.6FPL GPa14.3WD GPa
MOR109.0FPL MPa110.1WD MPa
DurabilityClass 5 Not DurableClass 5 Not Durable
StabilityModerateModerate
Fire (E84)Class B indicativeClass B indicative
Radial Shrink4.8WD %5.8WD %
Tangential Shrink9.9WD %11.7WD %
T/R Ratio2.062.02

Figures carry the same source status as the species pages they come from — verified where cited, indicative where marked.

Best for

ApplicationRecommendedSuitability
Flooring / wear surfaces🥇 Hard Maple★★★☆☆
Furniture / interior joinery🥇 Hard Maple★★☆☆☆
Structural / load-bearing🥇 European Beech★★★★☆

Advantages & limitations

Hard Maple

Advantages

    Limitations

    • Not durable outdoors untreated (Class 5)
    • Noticeable seasonal movement — allow for it in design

    European Beech

    Advantages

      Limitations

      • Not durable outdoors untreated (Class 5)
      • Noticeable seasonal movement — allow for it in design
      • Hard on tooling; pre-drilling recommended

      Recommendation

      Choose Hard Maple if…

      • You want the stronger all-round engineering profile

      Choose European Beech if…

      • Its profile matches the application better than a single overall score

      Frequently asked questions

      Which is more durable, Hard Maple or European Beech?

      Neither — both carry the same EN 350 rating (Class 5, Not Durable). For outdoor decisions between them, weigh dimensional stability and hardness instead.

      Which wood is better for outdoor use?

      They are closely matched outdoors — durability and stability come out almost level. Let the application decide: harder surface for decking traffic, lighter weight for cladding.

      Is Hard Maple harder than European Beech?

      They measure the same on the Janka scale (1450 lbf each) — effectively equal in surface hardness.

      How we score. Each wood gets a weighted composite of the verified figures shown above: durability 22%, stability 18%, hardness 12%, bending strength 12%, machining ease 12%, stiffness 8%, flame spread 8%, lightness 8%. The Library Score is that composite's percentile rank within our 60-species library — 50 means the library median, 90 means it outperforms nine of every ten species we cover. No price data is scored — cost guidance is qualitative. The score summarises the data; it does not replace judgement about your specific application.

      Compare next