Skip to content
Home / Wood Compare / Iroko vs Teak
Professional Comparison · Source-attributed engineering data · Updated 19 July 2026

Iroko VS Teak

Which wood is better for your project? Scores are computed from the verified figures on each species page — how we score.
🥇
Iroko
82/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood🌧Outdoor💧Moisture Stable
  • Better dimensional stability (Excellent vs Moderate)
  • Harder wear surface (Janka 1260 vs 1070 lbf)

Full Iroko data sheet →

🥈
Teak
72/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood🌧Outdoor
  • Easier to machine and fasten
  • Solid choice where its profile fits the project

Full Teak data sheet →

Visual comparison

IrokoTeak
Hardness (Janka)percentile of 60-species library
Densitypercentile of 60-species library
Bending strength (MOR)percentile of 60-species library
Stiffness (MOE)percentile of 60-species library
Durabilitypercentile of 60-species library
Dimensional stabilitypercentile of 60-species library

Winner by category

There isn't one universally best wood — there's a best wood for each purpose.

CategoryWinner
DurabilityTie
StabilityIroko
HardnessIroko
Strength (MOR)Teak
Stiffness (MOE)Teak
Flame spreadTie
Machining easeTeak
LightnessTie

Engineering data

PropertyIrokoTeak
Janka Hardness1260WD lbf1070WD lbf
Density0.55FPL g/cm³0.55FPL g/cm³
MOE10.1FPL GPa10.7FPL GPa
MOR85.5FPL MPa100.0FPL MPa
DurabilityClass 1 Very DurableClass 1 Very Durable
StabilityExcellentModerate
Fire (E84)Class B indicativeClass B indicative
Radial Shrink2.8WD %2.6WD %
Tangential Shrink3.8WD %5.3WD %
T/R Ratio1.362.04

Figures carry the same source status as the species pages they come from — verified where cited, indicative where marked.

Best for

ApplicationRecommendedSuitability
Outdoor decking / pergola🥇 Iroko★★★★★
Exterior cladding🥇 Iroko★★★★☆
Flooring / wear surfaces🥇 Iroko★★★★☆
Furniture / interior joinery🥇 Iroko★★★☆☆
Structural / load-bearing🥇 Teak★★☆☆☆

Advantages & limitations

Iroko

Advantages relative to Teak

  • Janka is 1,260 lbf vs 1,070 lbf, about 18% harder

Limitations relative to Teak

  • MOR is 85.5 MPa vs 100 MPa, about 15% lower

Teak

Advantages relative to Iroko

  • MOR is 100 MPa vs 85.5 MPa, about 17% higher

Limitations relative to Iroko

  • Janka is 1,070 lbf vs 1,260 lbf, about 15% lower

Recommendation

Choose Iroko if…

  • Exterior and structural joinery — beams, frames, flooring, parquet, panelling — where the higher dent resistance matters and the shared Class 1 durability and Class B fire class are the baseline
  • Boat decks, marine and port work, furniture and truck bodies where the harder natural exterior hardwood is the specification

Choose Teak if…

  • Boat decks and marine construction, bridges, docks, quays and floodgates, exterior joinery, doors and cladding where the higher bending strength matters under load and the traditional teak role is the specification
  • High-end and garden furniture, flooring and decorative veneer where the documented teak signature use is what the project is specifying

Frequently asked questions

Which is more durable, Iroko or Teak?

Neither — both carry the same EN 350 rating (Class 1, Very Durable). For outdoor work the separation is movement, not decay: Iroko moves 3.8% tangentially against 5.3%, which decides board width and fixing spacing more than the durability class does.

Which wood is better for outdoor use?

Iroko — outdoor performance combines decay durability with dimensional stability, and it leads on that combination.

Is Iroko harder than Teak?

Yes — Janka 1260 lbf vs 1070 lbf.

How we score. Each Library Score is a weighted composite of the verified figures above, expressed as a percentile against our 60-species library. Cost is handled qualitatively, never scored. Full weighting and what it excludes.

Compare next