Skip to content
Home / Wood Compare / Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine vs Sweet Chestnut
Professional Comparison · Verified Engineering Data · Updated 19 July 2026

Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine VS Sweet Chestnut

Which wood is better for your project? Scores are computed from the verified figures on each species page — how we score.
🥇
Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine
68/100 Library Score
🌲Softwood🌧Outdoor💧Moisture Stable🌿Sustainable
  • Higher durability (EN 350 Class 1 vs Class 2)
  • Better dimensional stability (Exceptional vs Excellent)

Full Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine data sheet →

🥈
Sweet Chestnut
51/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood🌧Outdoor💧Moisture Stable
  • Close second across most categories
  • Solid choice where its profile fits the project

Full Sweet Chestnut data sheet →

Visual comparison

Accoya Acetylated Radiata PineSweet Chestnut
Hardness (Janka)percentile of 60-species library
Densitypercentile of 60-species library
Bending strength (MOR)percentile of 60-species library
Stiffness (MOE)percentile of 60-species library
Durabilitypercentile of 60-species library
Dimensional stabilitypercentile of 60-species library

Winner by category

There isn't one universally best wood — there's a best wood for each purpose.

CategoryWinner
DurabilityAccoya Acetylated Radiata Pine
StabilityAccoya Acetylated Radiata Pine
HardnessTie
Strength (MOR)Sweet Chestnut
Stiffness (MOE)Sweet Chestnut
Flame spreadSweet Chestnut
Machining easeAccoya Acetylated Radiata Pine
LightnessAccoya Acetylated Radiata Pine

Engineering data

PropertyAccoya Acetylated Radiata PineSweet Chestnut
Janka Hardness710 lbf680WD lbf
Density0.51 g/cm³0.56WD g/cm³
MOE8.5 GPa8.61WD GPa
MOR60.0 MPa71.4WD MPa
DurabilityClass 1 Very Durable (treated)Class 2 Durable
StabilityExceptionalExcellent
Fire (E84)Class C indicativeClass B indicative
Radial Shrink0.7 %4.2WD %
Tangential Shrink1.5 %6.9WD %
T/R Ratio2.141.64

Figures carry the same source status as the species pages they come from — verified where cited, indicative where marked.

Best for

ApplicationRecommendedSuitability
Outdoor decking / pergola🥇 Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine★★★★★
Exterior cladding🥇 Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine★★★★★
Flooring / wear surfaces🥇 Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine★★★☆☆
Furniture / interior joinery🥇 Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine★★★★☆
Structural / load-bearing🥇 Sweet Chestnut★☆☆☆☆
Sauna / wet interiors🥇 Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine★★★★★

Advantages & limitations

Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine

Advantages

  • Rated for exterior exposure (EN 350 Class 1)
  • Very low movement in service

Limitations

  • Soft surface — dents under point loads

Sweet Chestnut

Advantages

  • Rated for exterior exposure (EN 350 Class 2)
  • Very low movement in service

Limitations

  • Soft surface — dents under point loads

Recommendation

Choose Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine if…

  • The project lives outdoors and service life is the priority
  • You need minimal movement (doors, decking, panelling)

Choose Sweet Chestnut if…

  • Its profile matches the application better than a single overall score

Frequently asked questions

Which is more durable, Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine or Sweet Chestnut?

Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine — it carries the better EN 350 rating (Class 1 vs Class 2). Lower class numbers mean higher natural durability.

Which wood is better for outdoor use?

Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine — outdoor performance combines decay durability with dimensional stability, and it leads on that combination.

Is Accoya Acetylated Radiata Pine harder than Sweet Chestnut?

Yes — Janka 710 lbf vs 680 lbf.

How we score. Each wood gets a weighted composite of the verified figures shown above: durability 22%, stability 18%, hardness 12%, bending strength 12%, machining ease 12%, stiffness 8%, flame spread 8%, lightness 8%. The Library Score is that composite's percentile rank within our 60-species library — 50 means the library median, 90 means it outperforms nine of every ten species we cover. No price data is scored — cost guidance is qualitative. The score summarises the data; it does not replace judgement about your specific application.

Compare next