Skip to content
Home / Wood Compare / African Blackwood vs Lignum Vitae
Professional Comparison · Source-attributed engineering data · Updated 19 July 2026

African Blackwood VS Lignum Vitae

Which wood is better for your project? Scores are computed from the verified figures on each species page — how we score.
Verdict: near-tie. The right choice depends on the application — see winner by category below.
🥇
African Blackwood
94/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood🌧Outdoor🔥Low Flame Spread💧Moisture Stable
  • Stronger in bending (MOR 213.0 vs 130.0 MPa)

Full African Blackwood data sheet →

🥈
Lignum Vitae
92/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood🌧Outdoor🔥Low Flame Spread💧Moisture Stable
  • Close second across most categories
  • Solid choice where its profile fits the project

Full Lignum Vitae data sheet →

Visual comparison

African BlackwoodLignum Vitae
Hardness (Janka)percentile of 60-species library
Densitypercentile of 60-species library
Bending strength (MOR)percentile of 60-species library
Stiffness (MOE)percentile of 60-species library
Durabilitypercentile of 60-species library
Dimensional stabilitypercentile of 60-species library

Winner by category

There isn't one universally best wood — there's a best wood for each purpose.

CategoryWinner
DurabilityTie
StabilityTie
HardnessLignum Vitae
Strength (MOR)African Blackwood
Stiffness (MOE)Lignum Vitae
Flame spreadTie
Machining easeTie
LightnessTie

Engineering data

PropertyAfrican BlackwoodLignum Vitae
Janka Hardness3670WD lbf4390WD lbf
Density0.98WD g/cm³1.05FPL g/cm³
MOE17.95WD GPa19.0FPL GPa
MOR213.0WD MPa130.0FPL MPa
DurabilityClass 1 Very DurableClass 1 Very Durable
StabilityExcellentExcellent
Fire (E84)Class A indicativeClass A indicative
Radial Shrink2.9WD %4WD %
Tangential Shrink4.8WD %6.5WD %
T/R Ratio1.661.62

Figures carry the same source status as the species pages they come from — verified where cited, indicative where marked.

Best for

ApplicationRecommendedSuitability
Outdoor decking / pergola🥇 African Blackwood★★★★★
Exterior cladding🥇 African Blackwood★★★★☆
Flooring / wear surfaces🥇 Lignum Vitae★★★★★
Furniture / interior joinery🥇 African Blackwood★★☆☆☆
Structural / load-bearing🥇 African Blackwood★★★★★

Advantages & limitations

African Blackwood

Advantages relative to Lignum Vitae

  • MOR is 213 MPa vs 130 MPa, about 64% higher
  • Radial shrinkage 2.9% vs 4.0% and tangential 4.8% vs 6.5% — lower movement on both axes

Limitations relative to Lignum Vitae

  • Janka is 3,670 lbf vs 4,390 lbf

Lignum Vitae

Advantages relative to African Blackwood

  • Janka is 4,390 lbf vs 3,670 lbf, about 20% higher

Limitations relative to African Blackwood

  • MOR is 130 MPa vs 213 MPa, about 39% lower
  • Radial shrinkage 4.0% vs 2.9% and tangential 6.5% vs 4.8% — higher movement on both axes

Recommendation

Choose African Blackwood if…

  • Bending strength matters most — structural work, load-bearing joinery, tool handles
  • The piece must hold tolerances as humidity changes

Choose Lignum Vitae if…

  • Surface hardness is the deciding factor — wear parts, bearing surfaces, mallet heads
  • Flexural loading is low relative to abrasion

Frequently asked questions

Which is more durable, African Blackwood or Lignum Vitae?

Neither — both carry the same EN 350 rating (Class 1, Very Durable). For outdoor work the separation is movement, not decay: African Blackwood moves 4.8% tangentially against 6.5%, which decides board width and fixing spacing more than the durability class does.

Which wood is better for outdoor use?

Both are EN 350 Class 1, and tangential movement runs 4.8% for African Blackwood against 6.5% for Lignum Vitae — close enough that decay resistance will not choose between them, and African Blackwood holds its dimension marginally better. Lignum Vitae gives the harder wearing surface at 4,390 lbf; African Blackwood is the lighter section at 0.98 g/cm³ — traffic favours the first, cladding and handling the second.

Is African Blackwood harder than Lignum Vitae?

No — Lignum Vitae is harder (Janka 4390 vs 3670 lbf).

How we score. Each Library Score is a weighted composite of the verified figures above, expressed as a percentile against our 60-species library. Cost is handled qualitatively, never scored. Full weighting and what it excludes.

Compare next