Skip to content
Home / Wood Compare / Garapa vs Sal
Professional Comparison · Verified Engineering Data · Updated 19 July 2026

Garapa VS Sal

Which wood is better for your project? Scores are computed from the verified figures on each species page — how we score.
🥇
Garapa
79/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood🌧Outdoor💧Moisture Stable
  • Harder wear surface (Janka 1650 vs 1340 lbf)
  • Stronger in bending (MOR 127.8 vs 112.0 MPa)

Full Garapa data sheet →

🥈
Sal
71/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood🌧Outdoor💧Moisture Stable
  • Close second across most categories
  • Solid choice where its profile fits the project

Full Sal data sheet →

Visual comparison

GarapaSal
Hardness (Janka)percentile of 60-species library
Densitypercentile of 60-species library
Bending strength (MOR)percentile of 60-species library
Stiffness (MOE)percentile of 60-species library
Durabilitypercentile of 60-species library
Dimensional stabilitypercentile of 60-species library

Winner by category

There isn't one universally best wood — there's a best wood for each purpose.

CategoryWinner
DurabilityTie
StabilityTie
HardnessGarapa
Strength (MOR)Garapa
Stiffness (MOE)Garapa
Flame spreadTie
Machining easeSal
LightnessTie

Engineering data

PropertyGarapaSal
Janka Hardness1650WD lbf1340 lbf
Density0.72WD g/cm³0.74 g/cm³
MOE15.57WD GPa14.2 GPa
MOR127.8WD MPa112.0 MPa
DurabilityClass 2 DurableClass 2 Durable
StabilityGoodGood
Fire (E84)Class B indicativeClass B indicative
Radial Shrink4.2WD %4 %
Tangential Shrink7.5WD %7.5 %
T/R Ratio1.791.88

Figures carry the same source status as the species pages they come from — verified where cited, indicative where marked.

Best for

ApplicationRecommendedSuitability
Outdoor decking / pergola🥇 Garapa★★★★☆
Exterior cladding🥇 Garapa★★★☆☆
Flooring / wear surfaces🥇 Garapa★★★★☆
Furniture / interior joinery🥇 Sal★★☆☆☆
Structural / load-bearing🥇 Garapa★★★★☆

Advantages & limitations

Garapa

Advantages

  • Rated for exterior exposure (EN 350 Class 2)

Limitations

  • Hard on tooling; pre-drilling recommended
  • Heavy — consider structure and handling

Sal

Advantages

  • Rated for exterior exposure (EN 350 Class 2)

Limitations

  • Hard on tooling; pre-drilling recommended
  • Heavy — consider structure and handling

Recommendation

Choose Garapa if…

  • The surface takes traffic or impact

Choose Sal if…

  • Its profile matches the application better than a single overall score

Frequently asked questions

Which is more durable, Garapa or Sal?

Neither — both carry the same EN 350 rating (Class 2, Durable). For outdoor decisions between them, weigh dimensional stability and hardness instead.

Which wood is better for outdoor use?

They are closely matched outdoors — durability and stability come out almost level. Let the application decide: harder surface for decking traffic, lighter weight for cladding.

Is Garapa harder than Sal?

Yes — Janka 1650 lbf vs 1340 lbf.

How we score. Each wood gets a weighted composite of the verified figures shown above: durability 22%, stability 18%, hardness 12%, bending strength 12%, machining ease 12%, stiffness 8%, flame spread 8%, lightness 8%. The Library Score is that composite's percentile rank within our 60-species library — 50 means the library median, 90 means it outperforms nine of every ten species we cover. No price data is scored — cost guidance is qualitative. The score summarises the data; it does not replace judgement about your specific application.

Compare next