Skip to content
Home / Wood Compare / Sal vs Keruing
Professional Comparison · Verified Engineering Data · Updated 19 July 2026

Sal VS Keruing

Which wood is better for your project? Scores are computed from the verified figures on each species page — how we score.
🥇
Sal
71/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood🌧Outdoor💧Moisture Stable
  • Higher durability (EN 350 Class 2 vs Class 3)
  • Better dimensional stability (Good vs Moderate)
  • Better flame-spread class (Class B vs Class C)

Full Sal data sheet →

🥈
Keruing
39/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood
  • Close second across most categories
  • Solid choice where its profile fits the project

Full Keruing data sheet →

Visual comparison

SalKeruing
Hardness (Janka)percentile of 60-species library
Densitypercentile of 60-species library
Bending strength (MOR)percentile of 60-species library
Stiffness (MOE)percentile of 60-species library
Durabilitypercentile of 60-species library
Dimensional stabilitypercentile of 60-species library

Winner by category

There isn't one universally best wood — there's a best wood for each purpose.

CategoryWinner
DurabilitySal
StabilitySal
HardnessSal
Strength (MOR)Keruing
Stiffness (MOE)Keruing
Flame spreadSal
Machining easeKeruing
LightnessKeruing

Engineering data

PropertySalKeruing
Janka Hardness1340 lbf1270WD lbf
Density0.74 g/cm³0.69FPL g/cm³
MOE14.2 GPa14.5FPL GPa
MOR112.0 MPa113.0FPL MPa
DurabilityClass 2 DurableClass 3 Moderately Durable
StabilityGoodModerate
Fire (E84)Class B indicativeClass C indicative
Radial Shrink4 %5.2WD %
Tangential Shrink7.5 %10.9WD %
T/R Ratio1.882.1

Figures carry the same source status as the species pages they come from — verified where cited, indicative where marked.

Best for

ApplicationRecommendedSuitability
Outdoor decking / pergola🥇 Sal★★★★☆
Exterior cladding🥇 Sal★★★☆☆
Flooring / wear surfaces🥇 Sal★★★☆☆
Furniture / interior joinery🥇 Sal★★☆☆☆
Structural / load-bearing🥇 Keruing★★★★☆

Advantages & limitations

Sal

Advantages

  • Rated for exterior exposure (EN 350 Class 2)

Limitations

  • Hard on tooling; pre-drilling recommended
  • Heavy — consider structure and handling

Keruing

Advantages

    Limitations

    • Noticeable seasonal movement — allow for it in design
    • Heavy — consider structure and handling

    Recommendation

    Choose Sal if…

    • The project lives outdoors and service life is the priority
    • You need minimal movement (doors, decking, panelling)

    Choose Keruing if…

    • Its profile matches the application better than a single overall score

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is more durable, Sal or Keruing?

    Sal — it carries the better EN 350 rating (Class 2 vs Class 3). Lower class numbers mean higher natural durability.

    Which wood is better for outdoor use?

    Sal — outdoor performance combines decay durability with dimensional stability, and it leads on that combination.

    Is Sal harder than Keruing?

    Yes — Janka 1340 lbf vs 1270 lbf.

    How we score. Each wood gets a weighted composite of the verified figures shown above: durability 22%, stability 18%, hardness 12%, bending strength 12%, machining ease 12%, stiffness 8%, flame spread 8%, lightness 8%. The Library Score is that composite's percentile rank within our 60-species library — 50 means the library median, 90 means it outperforms nine of every ten species we cover. No price data is scored — cost guidance is qualitative. The score summarises the data; it does not replace judgement about your specific application.

    Compare next