Skip to content
Home / Wood Compare / Thermowood Birch ThermoD vs Thermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD
Professional Comparison · Verified Engineering Data · Updated 19 July 2026

Thermowood Birch ThermoD VS Thermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD

Which wood is better for your project? Scores are computed from the verified figures on each species page — how we score.
🥇
Thermowood Birch ThermoD
62/100 Library Score
🪵Hardwood🌧Outdoor💧Moisture Stable
  • Better dimensional stability (Good vs Moderate)
  • Stronger in bending (MOR 95.0 vs 78.0 MPa)

Full Thermowood Birch ThermoD data sheet →

🥈
Thermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD
38/100 Library Score
🌲Softwood🌧Outdoor
  • Easier to machine and fasten
  • Lighter (0.59 vs 0.62 g/cm³)
  • Solid choice where its profile fits the project

Full Thermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD data sheet →

Visual comparison

Thermowood Birch ThermoDThermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD
Hardness (Janka)percentile of 60-species library
Densitypercentile of 60-species library
Bending strength (MOR)percentile of 60-species library
Stiffness (MOE)percentile of 60-species library
Durabilitypercentile of 60-species library
Dimensional stabilitypercentile of 60-species library

Winner by category

There isn't one universally best wood — there's a best wood for each purpose.

CategoryWinner
DurabilityTie
StabilityThermowood Birch ThermoD
HardnessThermowood Birch ThermoD
Strength (MOR)Thermowood Birch ThermoD
Stiffness (MOE)Thermowood Birch ThermoD
Flame spreadTie
Machining easeThermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD
LightnessThermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD

Engineering data

PropertyThermowood Birch ThermoDThermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD
Janka Hardness1210ITWA lbf1100ITWA lbf
Density0.62ITWA g/cm³0.59ITWA g/cm³
MOE12.0ITWA GPa11.5ITWA GPa
MOR95.0ITWA MPa78.0ITWA MPa
DurabilityClass 2 Durable (treated)Class 2 Durable (treated)
StabilityGoodModerate
Fire (E84)Class C indicativeClass C indicative
Radial Shrink1.6ITWA %1.4ITWA %
Tangential Shrink3ITWA %2.9ITWA %
T/R Ratio1.882.07

Figures carry the same source status as the species pages they come from — verified where cited, indicative where marked.

Best for

ApplicationRecommendedSuitability
Outdoor decking / pergola🥇 Thermowood Birch ThermoD★★★★☆
Exterior cladding🥇 Thermowood Birch ThermoD★★★☆☆
Flooring / wear surfaces🥇 Thermowood Birch ThermoD★★★☆☆
Furniture / interior joinery🥇 Thermowood Birch ThermoD★★★☆☆
Structural / load-bearing🥇 Thermowood Birch ThermoD★★★☆☆
Sauna / wet interiors🥇 Thermowood Birch ThermoD★★★★☆

Advantages & limitations

Thermowood Birch ThermoD

Advantages

  • Rated for exterior exposure (EN 350 Class 2)

Limitations

  • Few practical drawbacks within its intended uses

Thermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD

Advantages

  • Rated for exterior exposure (EN 350 Class 2)

Limitations

  • Noticeable seasonal movement — allow for it in design

Recommendation

Choose Thermowood Birch ThermoD if…

  • You need minimal movement (doors, decking, panelling)

Choose Thermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD if…

  • Ease of working and fastening matters
  • Weight matters — ceilings, wall panels, transport
  • Its profile matches the application better than a single overall score

Frequently asked questions

Which is more durable, Thermowood Birch ThermoD or Thermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD?

Neither — both carry the same EN 350 rating (Class 2, Durable (treated)). For outdoor decisions between them, weigh dimensional stability and hardness instead.

Which wood is better for outdoor use?

Thermowood Birch ThermoD — outdoor performance combines decay durability with dimensional stability, and it leads on that combination.

Is Thermowood Birch ThermoD harder than Thermowood Siberian Larch ThermoD?

Yes — Janka 1210 lbf vs 1100 lbf.

How we score. Each wood gets a weighted composite of the verified figures shown above: durability 22%, stability 18%, hardness 12%, bending strength 12%, machining ease 12%, stiffness 8%, flame spread 8%, lightness 8%. The Library Score is that composite's percentile rank within our 60-species library — 50 means the library median, 90 means it outperforms nine of every ten species we cover. No price data is scored — cost guidance is qualitative. The score summarises the data; it does not replace judgement about your specific application.

Compare next