Skip to content
Home / Species / Mango Wood
India and South Asia

Mango Wood

Mangifera indica

Also known as mango, mangowood  ·  Botanical Mangifera indica

Last updated: Reviewed by: Vriksai editorial team — timber trade professionalsEditorial policy
Revision history
  • — Data re-verified in site-wide audit (formulas, sources, durability classes)
  • — Working properties and comparable-species data cross-checked against listed sources
🪵Hardwood💧Moisture Stable🌿Sustainable
Janka Hardness
1070WD
lbf
Janka (metric)
4759calc
N
Hardness Class
Mediumcalc
Density
0.51wd
g/cm³
MOE
11.5wd
GPa
MOR
88.5WD
MPa
Durability
Class 5
Not Durable
Fire (E84)
Class C
indicative
Thermal k
0.143
W/m·K
Green MC
85
%
Fiber Saturation
28
%
Radial Shrink
3.6WD
%
Tangential Shrink
5.5WD
%
T/R Ratio
1.53derived
Stability
Excellentcalc
About the fire rating. Indicative only, derived from density and published data — not a certified rating. Real performance depends on product, thickness, coating and installation. What our ratings do and do not certify.

About Mango Wood

Mango Wood (Mangifera indica) is a mid-range timber, hard enough for everyday wear and still easy to work, with a Janka hardness of 1,070 lbf (4,759 N) and a density of about 0.51 g/cm³. It grows in India and South Asia.

Radial 3.6% against tangential 5.5% is an unusually even T/R ratio of 1.53 — Mango Wood shrinks close to uniformly, which is why it holds a flat panel in interior joinery and furniture. Its fibre saturation point is near 28%. Below it the wood shrinks steadily — 5.5% tangential, 3.6% radial. Ordinary territory: design the gaps rather than hoping the finish will hold it.5% tangential against 3.6% radial, quartersawn stock will behave noticeably better than flatsawn.

At 510 kg/m³ a cubic metre of Mango Wood weighs about 510 kg air-dry — that figure, the 5.5% tangential and 3.6% radial movement and the 1,070 lbf hardness are the three inputs the calculators below actually consume. Select Mango Wood in any of them to get species-specific results for weight, moisture, shrinkage and hardness.

Working properties

How Mango Wood behaves at the bench and on the machine, drawn from international wood-technology databases and South-Asian timber references.

MachiningEasy enough for a hardwood — it cuts and carves readily, which is why it carries so much shaped and turned work, but there are two catches: interlocked or wild grain tears out, and reaction wood can shift as it is sawn and bind on the blade. Its fairly high silica content dulls cutting edges quickly, so sharpen early and often.
FasteningTakes screws and nails readily without much splitting.
GluingGlues well with standard adhesives.
FinishingA strong suit — it sands, stains, waxes and polishes to a high lustre. Spalting from fungal activity is common and prized, giving the kaleidoscope of golden brown, yellow, pink and black streaks the wood is known for.
Steam bendingNot a recognised bending timber; its value is in carving and shaping.
DryingSeason it slowly and evenly, sealing the ends — it is less dense than many hardwoods and reacts to humidity swings, so it will warp, crack or split if rushed.

Durability & use classification

Mango is rated non-durable (EN 350 Class 5) and is susceptible to both fungal and insect attack. Be aware that furniture-trade marketing often claims mango is water-resistant and fine outdoors; the wood-technology sources do not support that — ratings run from moderately durable at best down to perishable. Treat it as an interior timber and keep it dry.

Typical applications & suitability

Indoor — Indoor use. Mango's real appeal is economic and environmental: it is a by-product of the fruit industry, harvested once trees stop cropping, which makes it an abundant, affordable and genuinely sustainable furniture hardwood.

Documented end-uses: furniture (its dominant use, especially in India), cabinetry and joinery, flooring, plywood and veneer, turned objects and carving, kitchenware and chopping boards, and musical instruments such as ukuleles and drums.

Comparable species

Species closest to Mango Wood by density, hardness, stiffness and bending strength, computed directly from the Vriksai species dataset rather than hand-picked.

Trade alternatives. Its closest look-alike in the trade is Rubber Wood — another plantation by-product timber, and easily confused with mango on finished furniture. For a durable Indian alternative at higher cost, Shisham (Sissoo) or Teak.

Alternatives to Mango Wood

Mango Wood measures 1,070 lbf Janka at 0.51 g/cm³, EN 350 durability Class 5, movement rated Excellent. Mango Wood is rated Excellent for movement, which is usually why it was specified — so nothing below trades that stability down. Read the numbers against the Janka scale and EN 350 durability classes.

Step up — harder than Mango Wood

For furniture and interior joinery that needs to survive handling as well as humidity. Harder resists denting; check the movement figures have not worsened with it.

Step down — softer than Mango Wood

Easier to machine and to hand-finish, for interior work where the surface is not taking abuse.

Similar, but more dimensionally stable

Already well behaved — these are the few in our library that are measurably steadier still. Size the gaps with the shrinkage predictor and EMC calculator.

Closest overall match

If Mango Wood is unavailable and the specification cannot change, these are the nearest substitutes across hardness, density, movement, stiffness, bending strength and durability class together — not on any single property. Lower distance means a closer match.

More durable for exterior use

Mango Wood is EN 350 Class 5, so untreated exterior service is not advisable. These reach Class 1–2 at comparable hardness.

Computed from measured properties only — hardness, density, movement, stiffness, bending strength and EN 350 class. Price, availability and appearance are never inputs. Figures are representative values, not consignment absolutes: two species within a few percent are equivalent until verified on the material. Full method and the rules the engine cannot break.

Substitution is a match on durability class, movement and strength — not on colour or grain. Where two candidates are close, compare them directly before specifying.

Compare Mango Wood side by side

These comparisons turn on movement and finish quality more than on raw strength. Every pairing shows the measured figures side by side; full matrix in the comparison index.

Understand the figures

Janka hardness scale — how the lbf figure is measured · Wood density reference — oven-dry vs air-dry basis · Moisture content — EMC, FSP and service conditions · Strength properties — MOR, MOE and what they govern.

Further reading. What is ThermoWood? · Wood moisture content explained · How to calculate board feet.

Common questions about Mango Wood

How hard is Mango Wood, and what does that mean in practice?
At 1,070 lbf (4,759 N) it sits in the middle of the hardness range. That is hard enough for domestic flooring, worktops and furniture in normal use, and still cuts cleanly with ordinary sharp tools. It is the range most cabinet and joinery timbers fall into, which is why it is such a common choice.
Will Mango Wood hold up outdoors?
Honestly, not on its own — it's rated Not Durable (Class 5, EN 350), so untreated it won't last long once it's exposed to weather or damp. If you want to use it outside, it needs proper preservative treatment and a maintained finish. For interior work, though, durability isn't a concern at all and you can use it freely.
Does Mango Wood move much once it's installed?
It's one of the more stable timbers, which is part of its appeal. Radial 3.6% against tangential 5.5% is an unusually even T/R ratio of 1.53 — Mango Wood shrinks close to uniformly, which is why it holds a flat panel in interior joinery and furniture. You'll still want it dried to the right moisture content for your climate, but cupping and gaps are less of a worry than with a less stable wood.

unverified no published source for this figure · WD The Wood Database (Eric Meier) · calc derived from the figures above · no published source found

Tools that use this species